<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Semantic Web's topics - tribe.net</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://semanticweb.tribe.net/threads/atom" />
  <subtitle>Tribe.net. Local Connections</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Semantic Web eyed for life sciences data</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://semanticweb.tribe.net/thread/e544ca50-287f-44b1-a259-4d28d39c507e" />
    <author>
      <name>gregcollver</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://semanticweb.tribe.net/thread/e544ca50-287f-44b1-a259-4d28d39c507e</id>
    <updated>2005-12-10T16:33:40Z</updated>
    <published>2005-12-10T16:33:40Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;Called Neurocommons.org, the project will provide a free repository of neurology-related data, tools and pathway knowledge for use by public and private researchers. 
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;http://weblog.infoworld.com/techwatch/archives/004720.html&lt;/div&gt;
				&lt;div&gt;
			posted in
			&lt;a href="http://semanticweb.tribe.net"&gt;Semantic Web&lt;/a&gt;
			- 0 replies
		&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>gregcollver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-12-10T16:33:40Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Visualization</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://semanticweb.tribe.net/thread/5cb4b996-ecc1-4ef4-bd5a-e81372b44506" />
    <author>
      <name>jamiepitts</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://semanticweb.tribe.net/thread/5cb4b996-ecc1-4ef4-bd5a-e81372b44506</id>
    <updated>2004-04-17T11:47:25Z</updated>
    <published>2004-02-13T01:01:38Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;I just posted something along these lines in the cypberpunk tribe:
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;What I have been thinking about lately is the semantic web and how it will be visually expressed. For example, how can one visually / audibly compare two different medical insurance policies to find the optimal situation? 
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Most depictions of the network center on the viewer moving through the network to access information, or perhaps a Matrix-style metaphore interface. 
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Command shells, web pages, email, messaging, and games - the main interfaces to cyberspace - are utterly unlike the depictions in literature and on screen. I predict that the semantic web will, out of sheer necessity, bring us new kinds of data visualization, but it may look more like a geometric video game than a visceral AT&amp;amp;T commercial.&lt;/div&gt;
				&lt;div&gt;
			posted in
			&lt;a href="http://semanticweb.tribe.net"&gt;Semantic Web&lt;/a&gt;
			- 1 reply
		&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>jamiepitts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-02-13T01:01:38Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Shirky Fallout</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://semanticweb.tribe.net/thread/177bab90-43bd-4ea0-b146-11f6ffa865e0" />
    <author>
      <name>jamiepitts</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://semanticweb.tribe.net/thread/177bab90-43bd-4ea0-b146-11f6ffa865e0</id>
    <updated>2003-11-18T02:02:59Z</updated>
    <published>2003-11-18T02:02:59Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;div&gt;Last week, Paul Ford of Ftrain posted an excellent response to Shirky's semantic punditry: 
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;http://www.ftrain.com/ContraShirky.html 
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;Peter Van Dijck also put up a very useful summary of the Shirky debate:
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/semantic/
&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;- James&lt;/div&gt;
				&lt;div&gt;
			posted in
			&lt;a href="http://semanticweb.tribe.net"&gt;Semantic Web&lt;/a&gt;
			- 0 replies
		&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>jamiepitts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-11-18T02:02:59Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>



